Ames
Rank in 2025
—
recorded as girls
#1753
recorded as boys
Up 259 since 2024
Babies in 2025
92
boys 92
Peak year
2023
93 babies recorded as boys
All-time total
1,865
since 1913
Born an Ames? See how many share your birth year.
Any year from 1880 to 2025.
Babies per 1,000 (same sex), 1880–2025
Recorded as girls
Recorded as boys
Ames was most popular in 2023, when 93 babies recorded as boys got the name (0.05 per 1,000). In 2025, 92 babies were named Ames, ranking #1753 for babies recorded as boys. Compared with 2018–2020, it's about the same.
Show every year
| Year | Girls | Rank | Boys | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | <5 | — | 92 | 1753 |
| 2024 | <5 | — | 76 | 2012 |
| 2023 | <5 | — | 93 | 1754 |
| 2022 | 5 | 15306 | 71 | 2094 |
| 2021 | <5 | — | 89 | 1784 |
| 2020 | <5 | — | 92 | 1694 |
| 2019 | <5 | — | 69 | 2081 |
| 2018 | <5 | — | 70 | 2046 |
| 2017 | <5 | — | 69 | 2032 |
| 2016 | 5 | 16215 | 87 | 1763 |
| 2015 | <5 | — | 51 | 2457 |
| 2014 | <5 | — | 42 | 2805 |
| 2013 | <5 | — | 38 | 2955 |
| 2012 | <5 | — | 56 | 2292 |
| 2011 | <5 | — | 31 | 3434 |
| 2010 | <5 | — | 13 | 6359 |
| 2009 | <5 | — | 9 | 8310 |
| 2008 | <5 | — | 15 | 5767 |
| 2007 | <5 | — | 6 | 10921 |
| 2006 | <5 | — | 6 | 10662 |
| 2005 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 2004 | <5 | — | 7 | 8927 |
| 2003 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 2002 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 2001 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 2000 | <5 | — | 11 | 5920 |
| 1999 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1998 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1997 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1996 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1995 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1994 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1993 | <5 | — | 5 | 8700 |
| 1992 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1991 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1990 | <5 | — | 6 | 7178 |
| 1989 | <5 | — | 16 | 3446 |
| 1988 | <5 | — | 22 | 2599 |
| 1987 | <5 | — | 14 | 3339 |
| 1986 | <5 | — | 18 | 2779 |
| 1985 | <5 | — | 12 | 3599 |
| 1984 | <5 | — | 18 | 2613 |
| 1983 | <5 | — | 22 | 2272 |
| 1982 | <5 | — | 17 | 2709 |
| 1981 | <5 | — | 18 | 2569 |
| 1980 | <5 | — | 16 | 2831 |
| 1979 | <5 | — | 10 | 3810 |
| 1978 | <5 | — | 8 | 4157 |
| 1977 | <5 | — | 14 | 2910 |
| 1976 | <5 | — | 12 | 3095 |
| 1975 | <5 | — | 14 | 2751 |
| 1974 | <5 | — | 8 | 3837 |
| 1973 | <5 | — | 7 | 4054 |
| 1972 | <5 | — | 12 | 2819 |
| 1971 | <5 | — | 11 | 2973 |
| 1970 | <5 | — | 14 | 2509 |
| 1969 | <5 | — | 16 | 2130 |
| 1968 | <5 | — | 12 | 2445 |
| 1967 | <5 | — | 11 | 2470 |
| 1966 | <5 | — | 10 | 2627 |
| 1965 | <5 | — | 8 | 2982 |
| 1964 | <5 | — | 8 | 3050 |
| 1963 | <5 | — | 6 | 3646 |
| 1962 | <5 | — | 9 | 2848 |
| 1961 | <5 | — | 10 | 2706 |
| 1960 | <5 | — | 8 | 3077 |
| 1959 | <5 | — | 9 | 2821 |
| 1958 | <5 | — | 18 | 1896 |
| 1957 | <5 | — | 9 | 2822 |
| 1956 | <5 | — | 14 | 2168 |
| 1955 | <5 | — | 9 | 2764 |
| 1954 | <5 | — | 7 | 3176 |
| 1953 | <5 | — | 10 | 2531 |
| 1952 | <5 | — | 9 | 2680 |
| 1951 | <5 | — | 11 | 2367 |
| 1950 | <5 | — | 6 | 3329 |
| 1949 | <5 | — | 7 | 3019 |
| 1948 | <5 | — | 8 | 2788 |
| 1947 | <5 | — | 6 | 3370 |
| 1946 | <5 | — | 6 | 3173 |
| 1945 | <5 | — | 5 | 3338 |
| 1944 | <5 | — | 8 | 2633 |
| 1943 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1942 | <5 | — | 5 | 3560 |
| 1941 | <5 | — | 6 | 3133 |
| 1940 | <5 | — | 11 | 2179 |
| 1939 | <5 | — | 12 | 2050 |
| 1938 | <5 | — | 7 | 2868 |
| 1937 | <5 | — | 7 | 2905 |
| 1936 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1935 | <5 | — | 9 | 2529 |
| 1934 | <5 | — | 6 | 3277 |
| 1933 | <5 | — | 7 | 3004 |
| 1932 | <5 | — | 11 | 2313 |
| 1931 | <5 | — | 9 | 2651 |
| 1930 | <5 | — | 12 | 2293 |
| 1929 | <5 | — | 10 | 2589 |
| 1928 | <5 | — | 10 | 2659 |
| 1927 | <5 | — | 6 | 3780 |
| 1926 | <5 | — | 5 | 4201 |
| 1925 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1924 | <5 | — | 7 | 3505 |
| 1923 | <5 | — | 8 | 3175 |
| 1922 | <5 | — | 8 | 3252 |
| 1921 | <5 | — | 10 | 2804 |
| 1920 | <5 | — | 8 | 3208 |
| 1919 | <5 | — | 7 | 3391 |
| 1918 | <5 | — | 8 | 3096 |
| 1917 | <5 | — | 7 | 3217 |
| 1916 | <5 | — | 11 | 2389 |
| 1915 | <5 | — | 9 | 2621 |
| 1914 | <5 | — | 5 | 3264 |
| 1913 | <5 | — | 7 | 2273 |
Free printables
Names like Ames
Names whose popularity rose and fell over the same years.
Where Ames is most popular
- California2.1×
- Texas1.8×
Times more common than the national rate, 2016–2025.
Recorded as girls 1% · boys 99% across all years