Esequiel
Rank in 2025
#6,143
recorded as boys
Down 484 since 2024
Babies in 2025
14
boys 14
Peak year
1881
5 babies recorded as boys
All-time total
2,944
since 1881
Born an Esequiel? See how many share your birth year.
Any year from 1880 to 2025.
Babies per 1,000 (same sex), 1880–2025
Recorded as boys
Esequiel was most popular in 1881, when 5 babies recorded as boys got the name (0.05 per 1,000). In 2025, 14 babies were named Esequiel, ranking #6143 for babies recorded as boys. Compared with 2018–2020, it's about the same.
Show every year
| Year | Girls | Rank | Boys | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | <5 | — | 14 | 6,143 |
| 2024 | <5 | — | 16 | 5,659 |
| 2023 | <5 | — | 23 | 4,456 |
| 2022 | <5 | — | 19 | 5,019 |
| 2021 | <5 | — | 12 | 6,698 |
| 2020 | <5 | — | 19 | 4,855 |
| 2019 | <5 | — | 12 | 6,777 |
| 2018 | <5 | — | 20 | 4,739 |
| 2017 | <5 | — | 16 | 5,526 |
| 2016 | <5 | — | 15 | 5,789 |
| 2015 | <5 | — | 15 | 5,746 |
| 2014 | <5 | — | 18 | 5,066 |
| 2013 | <5 | — | 24 | 4,064 |
| 2012 | <5 | — | 18 | 5,035 |
| 2011 | <5 | — | 22 | 4,356 |
| 2010 | <5 | — | 16 | 5,478 |
| 2009 | <5 | — | 30 | 3,551 |
| 2008 | <5 | — | 36 | 3,165 |
| 2007 | <5 | — | 32 | 3,379 |
| 2006 | <5 | — | 38 | 2,932 |
| 2005 | <5 | — | 33 | 3,091 |
| 2004 | <5 | — | 42 | 2,569 |
| 2003 | <5 | — | 22 | 3,838 |
| 2002 | <5 | — | 39 | 2,504 |
| 2001 | <5 | — | 34 | 2,742 |
| 2000 | <5 | — | 51 | 1,993 |
| 1999 | <5 | — | 48 | 1,995 |
| 1998 | <5 | — | 42 | 2,157 |
| 1997 | <5 | — | 49 | 1,890 |
| 1996 | <5 | — | 51 | 1,785 |
| 1995 | <5 | — | 48 | 1,801 |
| 1994 | <5 | — | 40 | 2,041 |
| 1993 | <5 | — | 35 | 2,209 |
| 1992 | <5 | — | 56 | 1,572 |
| 1991 | <5 | — | 37 | 2,019 |
| 1990 | <5 | — | 41 | 1,870 |
| 1989 | <5 | — | 24 | 2,615 |
| 1988 | <5 | — | 40 | 1,731 |
| 1987 | <5 | — | 39 | 1,709 |
| 1986 | <5 | — | 34 | 1,791 |
| 1985 | <5 | — | 40 | 1,594 |
| 1984 | <5 | — | 48 | 1,365 |
| 1983 | <5 | — | 37 | 1,594 |
| 1982 | <5 | — | 42 | 1,487 |
| 1981 | <5 | — | 52 | 1,270 |
| 1980 | <5 | — | 44 | 1,432 |
| 1979 | <5 | — | 36 | 1,598 |
| 1978 | <5 | — | 30 | 1,760 |
| 1977 | <5 | — | 33 | 1,645 |
| 1976 | <5 | — | 47 | 1,286 |
| 1975 | <5 | — | 43 | 1,322 |
| 1974 | <5 | — | 59 | 1,073 |
| 1973 | <5 | — | 32 | 1,514 |
| 1972 | <5 | — | 41 | 1,307 |
| 1971 | <5 | — | 28 | 1,668 |
| 1970 | <5 | — | 29 | 1,582 |
| 1969 | <5 | — | 19 | 1,914 |
| 1968 | <5 | — | 26 | 1,544 |
| 1967 | <5 | — | 23 | 1,609 |
| 1966 | <5 | — | 21 | 1,684 |
| 1965 | <5 | — | 29 | 1,429 |
| 1964 | <5 | — | 22 | 1,700 |
| 1963 | <5 | — | 17 | 1,957 |
| 1962 | <5 | — | 19 | 1,852 |
| 1961 | <5 | — | 17 | 1,997 |
| 1960 | <5 | — | 19 | 1,858 |
| 1959 | <5 | — | 18 | 1,916 |
| 1958 | <5 | — | 14 | 2,177 |
| 1957 | <5 | — | 25 | 1,583 |
| 1956 | <5 | — | 23 | 1,642 |
| 1955 | <5 | — | 24 | 1,572 |
| 1954 | <5 | — | 22 | 1,628 |
| 1953 | <5 | — | 27 | 1,455 |
| 1952 | <5 | — | 17 | 1,856 |
| 1951 | <5 | — | 25 | 1,489 |
| 1950 | <5 | — | 26 | 1,434 |
| 1949 | <5 | — | 22 | 1,583 |
| 1948 | <5 | — | 20 | 1,656 |
| 1947 | <5 | — | 21 | 1,646 |
| 1946 | <5 | — | 35 | 1,176 |
| 1945 | <5 | — | 18 | 1,581 |
| 1944 | <5 | — | 28 | 1,255 |
| 1943 | <5 | — | 21 | 1,529 |
| 1942 | <5 | — | 17 | 1,730 |
| 1941 | <5 | — | 15 | 1,821 |
| 1940 | <5 | — | 16 | 1,736 |
| 1939 | <5 | — | 15 | 1,795 |
| 1938 | <5 | — | 12 | 2,084 |
| 1937 | <5 | — | 12 | 2,088 |
| 1936 | <5 | — | 13 | 1,964 |
| 1935 | <5 | — | 11 | 2,246 |
| 1934 | <5 | — | 20 | 1,551 |
| 1933 | <5 | — | 17 | 1,707 |
| 1932 | <5 | — | 17 | 1,777 |
| 1931 | <5 | — | 21 | 1,538 |
| 1930 | <5 | — | 14 | 2,079 |
| 1929 | <5 | — | 15 | 2,002 |
| 1928 | <5 | — | 25 | 1,480 |
| 1927 | <5 | — | 16 | 2,034 |
| 1926 | <5 | — | 15 | 2,074 |
| 1925 | <5 | — | 16 | 2,012 |
| 1924 | <5 | — | 19 | 1,839 |
| 1923 | <5 | — | 13 | 2,331 |
| 1922 | <5 | — | 13 | 2,347 |
| 1921 | <5 | — | 17 | 1,980 |
| 1920 | <5 | — | 23 | 1,592 |
| 1919 | <5 | — | 20 | 1,695 |
| 1918 | <5 | — | 25 | 1,446 |
| 1917 | <5 | — | 16 | 1,900 |
| 1916 | <5 | — | 9 | 2,730 |
| 1915 | <5 | — | 11 | 2,310 |
| 1914 | <5 | — | 10 | 2,101 |
| 1913 | <5 | — | 7 | 2,273 |
| 1912 | <5 | — | 5 | 2,544 |
| 1911 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1910 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1909 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1908 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1907 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1906 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1905 | <5 | — | 5 | 1,233 |
| 1904 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1903 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1902 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1901 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1900 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1899 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1898 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1897 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1896 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1895 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1894 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1893 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1892 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1891 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1890 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1889 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1888 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1887 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1886 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1885 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1884 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1883 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1882 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1881 | <5 | — | 5 | 866 |
Free printables
Other spellings
Names like Esequiel
Names whose popularity rose and fell over the same years.
Where Esequiel is most popular
- Texas7.0×
Times more common than the national rate, 2016–2025.