Joaquin
Rank in 2025
—
recorded as girls
#355
recorded as boys
Babies in 2025
925
boys 925
Peak year
2020
1,083 babies recorded as boys
All-time total
35,654
since 1886
Born a Joaquin? See how many share your birth year.
Any year from 1880 to 2025.
Babies per 1,000 (same sex), 1880–2025
Recorded as girls
Recorded as boys
Joaquin was most popular in 2020, when 1,083 babies recorded as boys got the name (0.63 per 1,000). In 2025, 925 babies were named Joaquin, ranking #355 for babies recorded as boys. Compared with 2018–2020, it's about the same.
Show every year
| Year | Girls | Rank | Boys | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | <5 | — | 925 | 355 |
| 2024 | <5 | — | 1,011 | 340 |
| 2023 | <5 | — | 999 | 335 |
| 2022 | <5 | — | 1,029 | 329 |
| 2021 | <5 | — | 1,083 | 309 |
| 2020 | <5 | — | 1,083 | 306 |
| 2019 | <5 | — | 1,006 | 332 |
| 2018 | <5 | — | 954 | 347 |
| 2017 | <5 | — | 906 | 364 |
| 2016 | <5 | — | 1,003 | 346 |
| 2015 | <5 | — | 1,082 | 321 |
| 2014 | <5 | — | 1,045 | 327 |
| 2013 | <5 | — | 953 | 340 |
| 2012 | <5 | — | 970 | 326 |
| 2011 | <5 | — | 950 | 328 |
| 2010 | <5 | — | 1,030 | 309 |
| 2009 | <5 | — | 1,117 | 295 |
| 2008 | 5 | 17504 | 1,245 | 275 |
| 2007 | <5 | — | 1,180 | 290 |
| 2006 | <5 | — | 1,225 | 285 |
| 2005 | <5 | — | 847 | 350 |
| 2004 | <5 | — | 711 | 385 |
| 2003 | <5 | — | 559 | 451 |
| 2002 | 7 | 12187 | 467 | 495 |
| 2001 | <5 | — | 454 | 501 |
| 2000 | <5 | — | 367 | 563 |
| 1999 | <5 | — | 377 | 540 |
| 1998 | <5 | — | 354 | 555 |
| 1997 | <5 | — | 312 | 584 |
| 1996 | <5 | — | 305 | 589 |
| 1995 | 5 | 13386 | 311 | 581 |
| 1994 | <5 | — | 298 | 602 |
| 1993 | <5 | — | 299 | 593 |
| 1992 | 6 | 11738 | 270 | 627 |
| 1991 | <5 | — | 256 | 639 |
| 1990 | <5 | — | 280 | 599 |
| 1989 | <5 | — | 263 | 605 |
| 1988 | 5 | 11798 | 228 | 626 |
| 1987 | <5 | — | 239 | 586 |
| 1986 | <5 | — | 222 | 597 |
| 1985 | <5 | — | 255 | 550 |
| 1984 | 5 | 10422 | 247 | 550 |
| 1983 | <5 | — | 232 | 550 |
| 1982 | <5 | — | 248 | 546 |
| 1981 | <5 | — | 219 | 578 |
| 1980 | <5 | — | 270 | 520 |
| 1979 | <5 | — | 258 | 529 |
| 1978 | 5 | 9750 | 217 | 569 |
| 1977 | 5 | 9652 | 206 | 587 |
| 1976 | 5 | 9284 | 248 | 508 |
| 1975 | <5 | — | 250 | 506 |
| 1974 | <5 | — | 204 | 562 |
| 1973 | 5 | 8423 | 217 | 534 |
| 1972 | <5 | — | 188 | 580 |
| 1971 | <5 | — | 179 | 620 |
| 1970 | <5 | — | 163 | 635 |
| 1969 | <5 | — | 135 | 676 |
| 1968 | <5 | — | 114 | 707 |
| 1967 | <5 | — | 120 | 680 |
| 1966 | <5 | — | 102 | 730 |
| 1965 | <5 | — | 111 | 705 |
| 1964 | <5 | — | 118 | 711 |
| 1963 | <5 | — | 109 | 740 |
| 1962 | <5 | — | 92 | 793 |
| 1961 | <5 | — | 90 | 803 |
| 1960 | <5 | — | 94 | 788 |
| 1959 | <5 | — | 91 | 801 |
| 1958 | <5 | — | 95 | 761 |
| 1957 | <5 | — | 85 | 818 |
| 1956 | <5 | — | 87 | 796 |
| 1955 | <5 | — | 64 | 933 |
| 1954 | <5 | — | 66 | 908 |
| 1953 | <5 | — | 59 | 932 |
| 1952 | <5 | — | 85 | 763 |
| 1951 | <5 | — | 74 | 820 |
| 1950 | <5 | — | 69 | 819 |
| 1949 | <5 | — | 65 | 849 |
| 1948 | <5 | — | 57 | 910 |
| 1947 | <5 | — | 55 | 956 |
| 1946 | <5 | — | 48 | 967 |
| 1945 | <5 | — | 58 | 817 |
| 1944 | <5 | — | 52 | 878 |
| 1943 | <5 | — | 41 | 1053 |
| 1942 | <5 | — | 49 | 947 |
| 1941 | <5 | — | 52 | 876 |
| 1940 | <5 | — | 38 | 1050 |
| 1939 | <5 | — | 55 | 818 |
| 1938 | <5 | — | 48 | 912 |
| 1937 | <5 | — | 40 | 1000 |
| 1936 | <5 | — | 46 | 906 |
| 1935 | <5 | — | 38 | 1040 |
| 1934 | <5 | — | 50 | 888 |
| 1933 | <5 | — | 40 | 1013 |
| 1932 | <5 | — | 49 | 924 |
| 1931 | <5 | — | 52 | 887 |
| 1930 | <5 | — | 73 | 744 |
| 1929 | <5 | — | 58 | 869 |
| 1928 | <5 | — | 68 | 786 |
| 1927 | <5 | — | 66 | 822 |
| 1926 | <5 | — | 56 | 894 |
| 1925 | <5 | — | 57 | 890 |
| 1924 | <5 | — | 53 | 960 |
| 1923 | <5 | — | 57 | 905 |
| 1922 | <5 | — | 70 | 801 |
| 1921 | <5 | — | 45 | 1045 |
| 1920 | <5 | — | 59 | 896 |
| 1919 | <5 | — | 44 | 1024 |
| 1918 | <5 | — | 55 | 894 |
| 1917 | <5 | — | 38 | 1078 |
| 1916 | <5 | — | 38 | 1043 |
| 1915 | <5 | — | 32 | 1141 |
| 1914 | <5 | — | 28 | 1073 |
| 1913 | <5 | — | 26 | 969 |
| 1912 | <5 | — | 13 | 1353 |
| 1911 | <5 | — | 6 | 1537 |
| 1910 | <5 | — | 9 | 1118 |
| 1909 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1908 | <5 | — | 10 | 877 |
| 1907 | <5 | — | 5 | 1345 |
| 1906 | <5 | — | 5 | 1253 |
| 1905 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1904 | <5 | — | 5 | 1205 |
| 1903 | <5 | — | 5 | 1130 |
| 1902 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1901 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1900 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1899 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1898 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1897 | <5 | — | 5 | 1057 |
| 1896 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1895 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1894 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1893 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1892 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1891 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1890 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1889 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1888 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1887 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1886 | <5 | — | 6 | 845 |
Free printables
Names like Joaquin
Names whose popularity rose and fell over the same years.
Where Joaquin is most popular
- New Mexico3.8×
- California2.2×
- Texas2.1×
- Arizona1.8×
- Colorado1.5×
Times more common than the national rate, 2016–2025.
Recorded as girls <1% · boys 100% across all years