Leannah

Given to 302 US babies since 1889

▼ Falling −37% vs. 2018–2020

Rank in 2025
#13208
recorded as girls
Down 1,047 since 2024
Babies in 2025
6
girls 6
Peak year
1889
5 babies recorded as girls
All-time total
302
since 1889

Born a Leannah? See how many share your birth year.

Any year from 1880 to 2025.

Babies per 1,000 (same sex), 1880–2025

Recorded as girls
Babies per 1,000 (same sex), 1880–2025Leannah was most popular in 1889, when 5 babies recorded as girls got the name (0.03 per 1,000). In 2025, 6 babies were named Leannah, ranking #13208 for babies recorded as girls. Compared with 2018–2020, it's down 37%.00.010.020.030.0418801900192019401960198020002020Peak 1889 Babies per 1,000 (same sex), 1880–2025Leannah was most popular in 1889, when 5 babies recorded as girls got the name (0.03 per 1,000). In 2025, 6 babies were named Leannah, ranking #13208 for babies recorded as girls. Compared with 2018–2020, it's down 37%.00.010.020.030.041880192019602000Peak 1889

Leannah was most popular in 1889, when 5 babies recorded as girls got the name (0.03 per 1,000). In 2025, 6 babies were named Leannah, ranking #13208 for babies recorded as girls. Compared with 2018–2020, it's down 37%.

Download chart
Show every year
YearGirlsRankBoysRank
2025 6 13208 <5 —
2024 7 12161 <5 —
2023 7 12197 <5 —
2022 10 9680 <5 —
2021 8 11146 <5 —
2020 8 11090 <5 —
2019 11 9112 <5 —
2018 17 6792 <5 —
2017 14 7840 <5 —
2016 13 8393 <5 —
2015 15 7613 <5 —
2014 11 9517 <5 —
2013 17 7031 <5 —
2012 13 8632 <5 —
2011 19 6564 <5 —
2010 16 7513 <5 —
2009 14 8454 <5 —
2008 8 12579 <5 —
2007 14 8520 <5 —
2006 8 12420 <5 —
2005 5 16462 <5 —
2004 9 10690 <5 —
2003 11 9048 <5 —
2002 8 11108 <5 —
2001 7 12056 <5 —
2000 <5 — <5 —
1999 <5 — <5 —
1998 9 9260 <5 —
1997 6 12070 <5 —
1996 6 11807 <5 —
1995 <5 — <5 —
1994 <5 — <5 —
1993 <5 — <5 —
1992 <5 — <5 —
1991 <5 — <5 —
1990 <5 — <5 —
1989 <5 — <5 —
1988 <5 — <5 —
1987 <5 — <5 —
1986 <5 — <5 —
1985 <5 — <5 —
1984 <5 — <5 —
1983 <5 — <5 —
1982 <5 — <5 —
1981 <5 — <5 —
1980 <5 — <5 —
1979 <5 — <5 —
1978 <5 — <5 —
1977 <5 — <5 —
1976 <5 — <5 —
1975 <5 — <5 —
1974 <5 — <5 —
1973 <5 — <5 —
1972 <5 — <5 —
1971 <5 — <5 —
1970 <5 — <5 —
1969 <5 — <5 —
1968 <5 — <5 —
1967 <5 — <5 —
1966 <5 — <5 —
1965 <5 — <5 —
1964 <5 — <5 —
1963 <5 — <5 —
1962 <5 — <5 —
1961 <5 — <5 —
1960 <5 — <5 —
1959 <5 — <5 —
1958 <5 — <5 —
1957 <5 — <5 —
1956 <5 — <5 —
1955 <5 — <5 —
1954 <5 — <5 —
1953 <5 — <5 —
1952 <5 — <5 —
1951 <5 — <5 —
1950 <5 — <5 —
1949 <5 — <5 —
1948 <5 — <5 —
1947 <5 — <5 —
1946 <5 — <5 —
1945 <5 — <5 —
1944 <5 — <5 —
1943 <5 — <5 —
1942 <5 — <5 —
1941 <5 — <5 —
1940 <5 — <5 —
1939 <5 — <5 —
1938 <5 — <5 —
1937 <5 — <5 —
1936 <5 — <5 —
1935 <5 — <5 —
1934 <5 — <5 —
1933 <5 — <5 —
1932 <5 — <5 —
1931 <5 — <5 —
1930 <5 — <5 —
1929 <5 — <5 —
1928 <5 — <5 —
1927 <5 — <5 —
1926 <5 — <5 —
1925 <5 — <5 —
1924 <5 — <5 —
1923 <5 — <5 —
1922 <5 — <5 —
1921 <5 — <5 —
1920 <5 — <5 —
1919 <5 — <5 —
1918 <5 — <5 —
1917 <5 — <5 —
1916 <5 — <5 —
1915 <5 — <5 —
1914 <5 — <5 —
1913 <5 — <5 —
1912 <5 — <5 —
1911 <5 — <5 —
1910 <5 — <5 —
1909 <5 — <5 —
1908 <5 — <5 —
1907 <5 — <5 —
1906 <5 — <5 —
1905 <5 — <5 —
1904 <5 — <5 —
1903 <5 — <5 —
1902 <5 — <5 —
1901 <5 — <5 —
1900 <5 — <5 —
1899 <5 — <5 —
1898 <5 — <5 —
1897 <5 — <5 —
1896 <5 — <5 —
1895 <5 — <5 —
1894 <5 — <5 —
1893 <5 — <5 —
1892 <5 — <5 —
1891 <5 — <5 —
1890 <5 — <5 —
1889 5 1279 <5 —