Lilah
Rank in 2025
#179
recorded as girls
Babies in 2025
1,736
girls 1,736
Peak year
2025
1,736 babies recorded as girls
All-time total
24,664
since 1884
Born a Lilah? See how many share your birth year.
Any year from 1880 to 2025.
Babies per 1,000 (same sex), 1880–2025
Recorded as girls
Lilah was most popular in 2025, when 1,736 babies recorded as girls got the name (1.1 per 1,000). In 2025, 1,736 babies were named Lilah, ranking #179 for babies recorded as girls. Compared with 2018–2020, it's up 43%.
Show every year
| Year | Girls | Rank | Boys | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1,736 | 179 | <5 | — |
| 2024 | 1,690 | 179 | <5 | — |
| 2023 | 1,503 | 198 | <5 | — |
| 2022 | 1,364 | 219 | <5 | — |
| 2021 | 1,250 | 244 | <5 | — |
| 2020 | 1,258 | 240 | <5 | — |
| 2019 | 1,153 | 287 | <5 | — |
| 2018 | 1,155 | 287 | <5 | — |
| 2017 | 1,177 | 272 | <5 | — |
| 2016 | 1,093 | 299 | <5 | — |
| 2015 | 1,032 | 314 | <5 | — |
| 2014 | 1,051 | 316 | <5 | — |
| 2013 | 1,049 | 304 | <5 | — |
| 2012 | 1,032 | 310 | <5 | — |
| 2011 | 1,046 | 306 | <5 | — |
| 2010 | 964 | 336 | <5 | — |
| 2009 | 885 | 366 | <5 | — |
| 2008 | 774 | 416 | <5 | — |
| 2007 | 525 | 571 | <5 | — |
| 2006 | 308 | 864 | <5 | — |
| 2005 | 223 | 1067 | <5 | — |
| 2004 | 167 | 1278 | <5 | — |
| 2003 | 162 | 1284 | <5 | — |
| 2002 | 133 | 1432 | <5 | — |
| 2001 | 106 | 1700 | <5 | — |
| 2000 | 91 | 1869 | <5 | — |
| 1999 | 69 | 2182 | <5 | — |
| 1998 | 47 | 2798 | <5 | — |
| 1997 | 30 | 3716 | <5 | — |
| 1996 | 37 | 3149 | <5 | — |
| 1995 | 15 | 5958 | <5 | — |
| 1994 | 15 | 5984 | <5 | — |
| 1993 | 18 | 5206 | <5 | — |
| 1992 | 12 | 7067 | <5 | — |
| 1991 | 11 | 7430 | <5 | — |
| 1990 | 17 | 5286 | <5 | — |
| 1989 | 12 | 6531 | <5 | — |
| 1988 | 12 | 6277 | <5 | — |
| 1987 | 18 | 4474 | <5 | — |
| 1986 | 18 | 4347 | <5 | — |
| 1985 | 18 | 4282 | <5 | — |
| 1984 | 10 | 6291 | <5 | — |
| 1983 | 17 | 4286 | <5 | — |
| 1982 | 17 | 4347 | <5 | — |
| 1981 | 14 | 4963 | <5 | — |
| 1980 | 12 | 5544 | <5 | — |
| 1979 | 12 | 5427 | <5 | — |
| 1978 | 25 | 3098 | <5 | — |
| 1977 | 13 | 4942 | <5 | — |
| 1976 | 17 | 3812 | <5 | — |
| 1975 | 13 | 4593 | <5 | — |
| 1974 | 10 | 5360 | <5 | — |
| 1973 | 11 | 4871 | <5 | — |
| 1972 | 7 | 6558 | <5 | — |
| 1971 | 5 | 8324 | <5 | — |
| 1970 | 8 | 5818 | <5 | — |
| 1969 | 7 | 5974 | <5 | — |
| 1968 | 8 | 5147 | <5 | — |
| 1967 | 5 | 6804 | <5 | — |
| 1966 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1965 | 7 | 5289 | <5 | — |
| 1964 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1963 | 15 | 3336 | <5 | — |
| 1962 | 11 | 4011 | <5 | — |
| 1961 | 7 | 5309 | <5 | — |
| 1960 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1959 | 6 | 5566 | <5 | — |
| 1958 | 7 | 4890 | <5 | — |
| 1957 | 10 | 3930 | <5 | — |
| 1956 | 9 | 4161 | <5 | — |
| 1955 | 5 | 5828 | <5 | — |
| 1954 | 8 | 4278 | <5 | — |
| 1953 | 10 | 3687 | <5 | — |
| 1952 | 9 | 3796 | <5 | — |
| 1951 | 10 | 3482 | <5 | — |
| 1950 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1949 | 7 | 4235 | <5 | — |
| 1948 | 10 | 3350 | <5 | — |
| 1947 | 10 | 3448 | <5 | — |
| 1946 | 7 | 3994 | <5 | — |
| 1945 | 8 | 3388 | <5 | — |
| 1944 | 9 | 3139 | <5 | — |
| 1943 | 9 | 3249 | <5 | — |
| 1942 | 11 | 2817 | <5 | — |
| 1941 | 21 | 1750 | <5 | — |
| 1940 | 10 | 2737 | <5 | — |
| 1939 | 11 | 2592 | <5 | — |
| 1938 | 21 | 1703 | <5 | — |
| 1937 | 13 | 2317 | <5 | — |
| 1936 | 12 | 2386 | <5 | — |
| 1935 | 11 | 2575 | <5 | — |
| 1934 | 14 | 2187 | <5 | — |
| 1933 | 12 | 2404 | <5 | — |
| 1932 | 10 | 2831 | <5 | — |
| 1931 | 15 | 2105 | <5 | — |
| 1930 | 27 | 1499 | <5 | — |
| 1929 | 21 | 1766 | <5 | — |
| 1928 | 23 | 1738 | <5 | — |
| 1927 | 22 | 1828 | <5 | — |
| 1926 | 25 | 1667 | <5 | — |
| 1925 | 35 | 1347 | <5 | — |
| 1924 | 28 | 1612 | <5 | — |
| 1923 | 25 | 1672 | <5 | — |
| 1922 | 30 | 1508 | <5 | — |
| 1921 | 41 | 1205 | <5 | — |
| 1920 | 34 | 1349 | <5 | — |
| 1919 | 31 | 1393 | <5 | — |
| 1918 | 21 | 1805 | <5 | — |
| 1917 | 35 | 1219 | <5 | — |
| 1916 | 38 | 1147 | <5 | — |
| 1915 | 28 | 1339 | <5 | — |
| 1914 | 30 | 1098 | <5 | — |
| 1913 | 30 | 981 | <5 | — |
| 1912 | 13 | 1540 | <5 | — |
| 1911 | 15 | 1171 | <5 | — |
| 1910 | 13 | 1267 | <5 | — |
| 1909 | 13 | 1152 | <5 | — |
| 1908 | 12 | 1203 | <5 | — |
| 1907 | 12 | 1142 | <5 | — |
| 1906 | 9 | 1321 | <5 | — |
| 1905 | 12 | 1093 | <5 | — |
| 1904 | 7 | 1486 | <5 | — |
| 1903 | 14 | 931 | <5 | — |
| 1902 | 10 | 1133 | <5 | — |
| 1901 | 20 | 723 | <5 | — |
| 1900 | 11 | 1171 | <5 | — |
| 1899 | 17 | 791 | <5 | — |
| 1898 | 15 | 886 | <5 | — |
| 1897 | 12 | 931 | <5 | — |
| 1896 | 6 | 1416 | <5 | — |
| 1895 | 18 | 746 | <5 | — |
| 1894 | 16 | 744 | <5 | — |
| 1893 | 12 | 865 | <5 | — |
| 1892 | 11 | 908 | <5 | — |
| 1891 | 11 | 839 | <5 | — |
| 1890 | 7 | 1099 | <5 | — |
| 1889 | 7 | 1025 | <5 | — |
| 1888 | <5 | — | <5 | — |
| 1887 | 5 | 1147 | <5 | — |
| 1886 | 8 | 828 | <5 | — |
| 1885 | 5 | 1047 | <5 | — |
| 1884 | 7 | 851 | <5 | — |
Free printables
Other spellings
Names like Lilah
Names whose popularity rose and fell over the same years.
Where Lilah is most popular
- Maine2.4×
- New Hampshire2.1×
- West Virginia1.7×
- New Mexico1.5×
- Connecticut1.4×
Times more common than the national rate, 2016–2025.